Skip to main content

Administrative Review Council: Social Security Inquiry

NLA welcomed the opportunity to provide a submission to the Administrative Review Council's Social Security Inquiry. Below is a summary of our recommendations. 

A full version of our submission is available for download below and to the right. 

Summary of recommendations

National Legal Aid (NLA) strongly supports two-tiers of review for matters in the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART). This two-tier system was a long-standing and effective feature of the former Administrative Appeals Tribunal for social security and child support matters. We have advocated to retain this system as we consider it’s the best forum to ensure a trauma-informed, non-adversarial approach to resolve social security and child support matters for clients in the ART. This also provides efficiency for legal assistance services, Government and the ART, in maintaining an efficient process to resolve matters in Tier 1.

NLA does not believe that adequate time has passed to review the implementation of the two tiers within ART under the new legislation, particularly without Practice Directions differentiating between the two tiers. We have recommended that we be given the opportunity to provide further feedback closer to the delivery date of the review, once more time has elapsed. 

  • Recommendation 1: Maintain the two-tier system of review for matters in the Administrative Review Tribunal. 
  • Recommendation 2: Continue Tier 1 matters as a non-adversarial process, without government representation. 
  • Recommendation 3: Develop Practice Directions for the two-tier system in the Administrative Review Tribunal. 
  • Recommendation 4: Develop an Administrative Review Tribunal referral system for all matters to legal assistance providers.
  • Recommendation 5:
    • Improve Authorised Review Officer internal review process timeframes and explanation of reasonings. 
    • Improve processes for the internal review of decisions under the Child Support Assessment Act 1989 (Cth) by amending legislation to allow representatives to lodge the applications/responses on behalf of their clients. 
    • Introduction of statutory time limits for the delivery of an ARO decision, we suggest a 90-day limit like the NDIS. 
    • Introduction of a customer service guarantee, like the NDIS.
  • Recommendation 6: Implement a trauma-informed approach for NDIS matters in the Administrative Review Tribunal. 
  • Recommendation 7: Provide opportunity for further feedback closer to the delivery of the review in 2026.

National Legal Aid 2026-27 Pre-Budget Submission

National Legal Aid is urging the government to include funding for key strategic priorities in the 2026–27 budget to uphold access to justice. These include baseline funding to meet demand in the Federal Circuit and Family Court for victim-survivors of domestic and family violence, ongoing support for the NDIS Appeals Program, and preventing the Permanent Protection Visa Program and disaster response legal services from ending due to funding cliffs.
First Nations Justice Youth Justice Criminal Law

Supplementary Submission to Inquiry into Australia’s Youth Justice and Incarceration System

Australia’s youth justice system is in deepening crisis, with escalating criminalisation and detention causing serious and ongoing harm to children, particularly First Nations children. We call on the Commonwealth to urgently lead coordinated, evidence‑based reform by raising the age of criminal responsibility, ending harmful detention practices, ensuring detention is a last resort, and adequately funding legal assistance to protect children’s rights and futures.

Stay informed with the latest news, updates, and insights from National Legal Aid.

By clicking subscribe you're confirming that you agree with our Terms and Conditions.